Bhogapuram Airport Credit War Rekindles Political Divide

The successful commercial validation flight at the Bhogapuram greenfield international airport has pushed the long-delayed project into a decisive stage. Instead of drawing the curtain on a prolonged process, the milestone has reignited a familiar political contest in Andhra Pradesh over who deserves credit for large infrastructure works.

The ruling National Democratic Alliance and the opposition YSR Congress Party have entered a public sparring match, each asserting primacy in the airport’s execution. NDA leaders present the project as evidence of decisive governance after 2024, while the YSRCP insists that the foundations were firmly laid during its tenure through land acquisition, statutory clearances, and initial construction activity.

Political observers say the controversy reflects a broader pattern rather than a dispute over facts. “Projects of this scale usually span multiple governments. What we see is selective storytelling, with each side highlighting the phase that suits its narrative,” said K. Srinivasa Rao.

The debate has also revived older positions. NDA leaders have recalled earlier remarks by Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy questioning the need for a second airport near Visakhapatnam. Former minister Ganta Srinivasa Rao has alleged that protests and legal hurdles during the previous decade slowed progress at crucial stages.

YSRCP leaders counter that ceremonial launches should not be mistaken for tangible work. Senior leader Gudivada Amarnath argues that the most complex components, including approvals, rehabilitation of displaced families, and coordination among agencies, were handled between 2019 and 2024.

Infrastructure specialists note that both sides raise valid points. “Land acquisition and clearances consume the most time, while construction and commissioning are more visible later,” said R. Mahesh Kumar.

For policy watchers, the concern is outcomes, not ownership, as Bhogapuram airport approaches operations and political narratives continue to clash in public discourse.